Do We Need Government to Provide Lifeguards?

Some California lifeguards reportedly earned $200,000 in total yearly compensation courtesy of taxpayers.  Click here for the story.  Meanwhile, physicians in general practice with twenty years’ experience, who paid half a million dollars or more for their required education and training, earn an average of around $170,000 on a yearly basis.  At least with communism everyone would earn the same thing.  Instead, we have a complete inversion of the natural wage distribution.  The highly skilled and highly sought physicians are making less than the relatively less skilled and less demanded lifeguards. 

Lifeguards provide a valuable service–no one contests this–but there is little reason to repose our trust in government to efficiently manage lifeguards and their compensation.  There are no legitimate market failures that would evenly arguably require government intervention here.  The free market can handle this one just fine.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 9.1/10 (12 votes cast)
Do We Need Government to Provide Lifeguards?, 9.1 out of 10 based on 12 ratings
0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
This entry was posted in Labor and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Do We Need Government to Provide Lifeguards?

  1. Danneskjold says:

    “We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.”

    -Ayn Rand

    VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>